3 August 2020   Can Israelis broaden their protests beyond Netanyahu? - By: Jonathan Cook


30 July 2020   How Did We Get To This Dire State Of Affairs? - By: Alon Ben-Meir



23 July 2020   Trump The Wannabe Dictator - By: Alon Ben-Meir



16 July 2020   Less Transparency Will Worsen the Pandemic - By: Sam Ben-Meir

















5 أيلول 2015   "من الأزل".. آخر كتب الراحل جونتر جراس - بقلم: المركز الألماني للإعلام (ألمانيا إنفو/ almania info)

10 June 2020

Israel and the US step up efforts to intimidate the Hague war crimes court 

By: Jonathan Cook
print     send by email

In the near-two decades since the International Criminal Court was set up to try the worst violations of international human rights law, it has faced harsh criticism for its highly selective approach to the question of who should be put on trial.

Created in 2002, the court, it was imagined, would act as a deterrent against the erosion of an international order designed to prevent a repetition of the atrocities of the Second World War.
Such hopes did not survive long.

The court, which sits in The Hague in the Netherlands, almost immediately faced a difficult test: whether it dared to confront the world’s leading superpower, the United States, as it launched a “war on terror”.

The ICC’s prosecutors refused to grasp the nettle posed by the US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Instead, they chose the easiest targets: for too long, it looked as though war crimes were only ever committed by Africans.

Now, the ICC’s chief prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, looks poised finally to give the court some teeth. She is threatening to investigate two states – the US and Israel – whose actions have been particularly damaging to international law in the modern era.

The court is considering examining widespread human rights abuses perpetrated by US soldiers in Afghanistan, and crimes committed by Israeli soldiers in the occupied Palestinian territories, especially Gaza, as well as the officials responsible for Israel’s illegal settlement programme.

An investigation of both is critically important: the US has crafted for itself a role as global policeman, while Israel’s flagrant violations of international law have been ongoing for more than half a century.

The US is the most powerful offender, and Israel the most persistent.

Both states have long dreaded this moment – the reason they refused to ratify the Rome Statute that established the ICC.

Last week Mike Pompeo, the US Secretary of State, stepped up US attacks on the court, saying its administration was “determined to prevent having Americans and our friends and allies in Israel and elsewhere hauled in by this corrupt ICC”.

A large, bipartisan majority of US Senators sent a letter to Pompeo last month urging him to ensure “vigorous support” for Israel against the Hague court.

Israel and the US have each tried to claim an exemption from international law on the grounds that they did not sign up to the court.

But this only underscores the problem. International law is there to protect the weak from abuses committed by the strong.

The victim from the bully.

A criminal suspect does not get to decide whether their victim can make a complaint, or whether the legal system should investigate. The same must apply in international law if it is to have any meaningful application.

Even under Bensouda, the process has dragged out interminably. It has taken years for her office to conduct a preliminary investigation and to determine, as she did in late April, that Palestine falls under the ICC’s jurisdiction because it qualifies as a state.

The delay made little sense, given that the State of Palestine is recognised by the United Nations, and it was able to ratify the Rome Statute five years ago.

The Israeli argument is that Palestine lacks the normal features of a sovereign state. However, as the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem recently noted, this is precisely because Israel has occupied the Palestinians’ territory and illegally transferred settlers onto their land.

Israel is claiming an exemption by citing the very crimes that need investigating.

Bensouda has asked the court’s judges to rule on her view that the ICC’s jurisdiction extends to Palestine. It is not clear how soon they will issue a verdict.

Pompeo’s threats last week – he said the US will soon make clear how it will retaliate – are intended to intimidate the court.

Bensouda has warned that her office is being subjected to “misinformation and smear campaigns”. In January, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused the court of being “antisemitic”.

In the past, Washington has denied Bensouda a travel visa, and threatened to confiscate her and the ICC judges’ assets and put them on trial. The US has also vowed to use force to liberate any Americans put in the dock.

There are indications the judges may now be searching for a bolt hole. They have asked Israel and the Palestinian Authority to respond urgently to questions about whether the temporary Oslo accords, signed more than 25 years ago, are still legally binding.

Israel has argued that the lack of resolution to the Oslo process precludes the Palestinians from claiming statehood. That would leave Israel, not the ICC, with jurisdiction over the territories.

On Monday Bensouda was reported to have given her view that the Oslo accords should have no bearing on whether an investigation proceeds.

Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian president, told the ICC last week that the PA considers itself exempt from its Oslo obligations, given that Israel has announced imminent plans to annex swaths of Palestinian territory in the West Bank.

Annexation was given a green light under President Trump’s “peace plan” unveiled earlier in the year.

Bensouda’s term as prosecutor finishes next year. Israel may hope to continue stonewalling until she is gone. Elyakim Rubinstein, a former Israeli Supreme Court judge, called last month for a campaign to ensure that her successor is more sympathetic to Israel.

But if Bensouda does get the go-ahead, Netanyahu and an array of former generals, including his Defence Minister Benny Gantz, would likely be summoned for questioning. If they refuse, an international arrest warrant could be issued, theoretically enforceable in the 123 countries that ratified the court.

Neither Israel nor the US is willing to let things reach that point.

They have recruited major allies to the fight, including Australia, Canada, Brazil and several European states. Germany, the court’s second largest donor, has threatened to revoke its contributions if the ICC proceeds.

Maurice Hirsch, a former legal adviser to the Israeli army, wrote a column last month in Israel Hayom, a newspaper widely seen as Netanyahu’s mouthpiece, accusing Bensouda of being a “hapless pawn of Palestinian terrorists”.

He suggested that other states threaten to pull their contributions, deny ICC staff the travel visas necessary for their investigations and even quit the court.

That would destroy any possibility of enforcing international law – an outcome that would delight both Israel and the US.

It would render ICC little more than a dead letter, just as Israel, backed by the US, prepares to press ahead with the West Bank’s annexation.

* Jonathan Cook is a writer and journalist based in Nazareth, Israel. His latest book, released this month, is “Disappearing Palestine: Israel's Experiments in Human Despair” (Zed Books). His website is www.jkcook.net. - mail@jkcook.net



Name
Email
Comment
Security Code

6 اّب 2020   عندما تذكر الشاعر بيروته..! - بقلم: جواد بولس

6 اّب 2020   بيروت كما عرفتُها..! - بقلم: توفيق أبو شومر

5 اّب 2020   بيروت في قلوبنا وصدورنا وخلجات نفوسنا - بقلم: د. عبد الستار قاسم

5 اّب 2020   بيروت اختارت البحر..! - بقلم: بكر أبوبكر

5 اّب 2020   قُـدسُ فلسطين: ما بين الكلاشينكوف وآلة الكـمـان؟ - بقلم: د. مكرم خُوري - مَخُّول

5 اّب 2020   متى يتوقف الجهلة عن الإفتاء بغير علم؟! - بقلم: المحامي إبراهيم شعبان

5 اّب 2020   الأوطان المنكوبة يُهاجَر منها، لا إليها..! - بقلم: توفيق أبو شومر

4 اّب 2020   حراك ”بدنا نعيش“.. النسخة الاسرائيلية..! - بقلم: د. سفيان أبو زايدة


4 اّب 2020   بين الدولة وأوسلو..! - بقلم: محسن أبو رمضان


4 اّب 2020   مهرجان فتح- حماس.. التحديات والفرص,,! - بقلم: علاء الدين عزت أبو زيد

4 اّب 2020   الفكرة بين الجماهيرية والصواب..! - بقلم: بكر أبوبكر

4 اّب 2020   الماهية أصل سابق والهوية فرع لاحق - بقلم: صادق جواد سليمان

4 اّب 2020   علاج التدهور الاقتصادي في الدول الفقيرة - بقلم: د. عبد الستار قاسم


5 اّب 2020   وقائع استخدام إسرائيل "قانون أملاك الغائبين" لسلب أملاك الفلسطينيين في القدس المحتلة..! - بقلم: المركز الفلسطيني للدراسات الإسرائيلية - مدار

5 اّب 2020   20 يوما أمام الحكومة لإقرار الميزانية وإلا فانتخابات رابعة شبه حتمية..! - بقلم: المركز الفلسطيني للدراسات الإسرائيلية - مدار










27 اّذار 2011   عداد الدفع المسبق خال من المشاعر الإنسانية..!! - بقلم: محمد أبو علان

13 شباط 2011   سقط مبارك فعادت لنا الحياة - بقلم: خالد الشرقاوي

4 شباط 2011   لا مستحيل..!! - بقلم: جودت راشد الشويكي


6 اّب 2020   حتام الصبر..؟! - بقلم: شاكر فريد حسن

6 اّب 2020   النقد الشخصاني ثرثرة بلا مضمون..! - بقلم: نبيل عودة

5 اّب 2020   بيروت أبت أن تموت..! - بقلم: د. عبد الرحيم جاموس

5 اّب 2020   سلامٌ عليكِ..! - بقلم: فراس حج محمد

5 اّب 2020   سلامًا لبيروت..! - بقلم: شاكر فريد حسن


8 كانون ثاني 2011   "صحافة المواطن" نافذة للأشخاص ذوي الاعاقة - بقلم: صدقي موسى

10 تشرين ثاني 2010   رساله .. - بقلم: جودت راشد الشويكي

3 تشرين ثاني 2010   شخبطة صحفية - بقلم: حسناء الرنتيسي

27 تشرين أول 2010   المدلل .. - بقلم: جودت راشد الشويكي

21 تشرين أول 2010   فضفضة مواطنية - بقلم: حسناء الرنتيسي


4 اّذار 2012   الطقش


26 كانون ثاني 2012   امرأة في الجفتلك



 
 
 
top

English | الصفحة الرئيسية | كاريكاتير | صحف ومجلات | أخبار وتقارير | اّراء حرة | الإرشيف | صوتيات | صحفيون وكتاب | راسلنا

جميع الحقوق محفوظة © لشبكة  أمين الأعلامية 2020- 1996 
تصميم وتطوير شبكة أمين الأعلامية